Tuesday, April 07, 2009

A good purpose for cycle-tracks and bike lanes?



General Motors reveals two-wheel PUMA electric-vehicle prototype

It’s based on the same driving principles as a skateboard. It looks like a phone booth, or perhaps a baby stroller. But despite the unconventional nature of this vehicle, General Motors says a two-seat, two-wheel ride called PUMA could be a solution to loosen congestion in crowded urban areas.

The acronym stands for Personal Urban Mobility and Accessibility, and on Tuesday GM is announcing a partnership with small vehicle company Segway to develop the diminutive rides. A prototype is also expected to be demonstrated in New York.

PUMA vehicles employ existing technologies, including a lithium-ion battery, dual electric wheel motors and connectivity with other vehicles and infrastructure. They can travel at speeds of 35 mph and have a range of 35 miles between charges. In addition to big cities, they could be used in parks, college campuses, amusement parks, resorts and other areas where short distances are usually traveled.

GM says the prototype in New York is operational, and expects a next-generation model to appear later this year. In early 2010, a complete concept could be unveiled. The rides look like golf carts, though executives say catchy design could be part of a production version if the project continues.

It’s based on the premise that many cars are “over-engineered” for some driving situations. A Cadillac Escalade, for example, is probably unnecessary to drive a few blocks in Manhattan, where research says the average speed was 18.8 miles per house and three-quarters of the population doesn’t own a car, according to research cited by GM, which has been working with Segway for about 18 months on the project.

“It’s not replacing vehicles as we know them--it’s complementing them in an urban environment,” said Chris Borroni-Bird, director of advance technology vehicle concepts for GM.

The PUMAs would be a tradeoff in features--the two passengers sit snugly side-by-side, but could prove to be a money saver. The cost could be one-quarter to one-third of owning a conventional midsize vehicle, GM says. Because they’re small, ease of parking would also be a key selling point, as up to 30-40 percent of fuel is believed to be consumed looking for parking in urban areas.

Still, the project is a bit fanciful, as GM envisions a potential layout where cars interact using an onboard transponder and can brake and accelerate through intersections to avoid accidents and pedestrians. Though GM based much of its research on New York City, the PUMA vehicles could launch overseas first. Domestically, the program could help bolster the automaker’s green credentials.

“The [auto] Task Force is looking for us to show a vision of the future, and I think this could be a part of it,” Borroni-Bird said.

From AutoWeek



Haven't I seen these somewhere recently?

11 comments:

Michael Graff said...

Since it can go faster than a bike, it ought to be allowed to use all the same roads a bike can use.

But the electric vehicle industry has promoted restrictions on their use.
http://evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=322

PM Summer said...

Great link, Michael. Thanks!

Ed W said...

The print version of USAToday said something about dedicated infrastructure similar to bike lanes. Now, I'm no fan of bike lanes, but I can see these devices zipping along comfortably in them, scattering cyclists in their wake. I can see that they're small enough to go up on sidewalks, scattering pedestrians in their wake. And I can see the makers lobbying for special consideration much as Segway did just before their devices hit the market.

It's an interesting concept. Just put it on the street where it belongs.

Steve A said...

I think the simplest answer is that the PR got delayed by six days. One that made it out on time is at:
http://www.bicyclefixation.com/blog/archives/00000302.html

Tim said...

I saw a report on this on a noon time CNN feature. Just shows the stupidity of the GM marketing machine that they used a bicycle lane for their NYC demo/rollout. It just promotes a new Segway Inferiority Complex! Even the CNN talking head ended the feature with a comment on how scary it looked to drive that down a road... This puppy is DOA now.

velociped said...

@PM Summer
"Haven't I seen these somewhere recently?"

Forget recently; I remember seeing one forty years ago.

@Michael Graff
"it ought to be allowed to use all the same roads a bike can use."

Legally, it cannot. No headlamp; no taillights; no provision for annual inspection.

@Ed W
"I can see the makers lobbying for special consideration much as Segway did..."

Yes and Segway lost. Some communities have banned the Segway altogether, because they are not safe for use in the pedestrian mix of sidewalks and they do not qualify as electric vehicles for the precise reasons I earlier mentioned. Where Segway operation is allowed, it is on the sidewalk, with RoW given to pedestrians.

For the same reasons one does not see golf carts being used on the public roads, it is unlikely these things will be allowed either.

While I think Kamen is light years ahead of the curve with many of his ideas, the Segway was not among them. They have their place and many of them are being used in that capacity at present - as campus limited public safety and maintenance vehicles. Among the rest of society they are unlikely to ever amount to more than a novelty.

@Steve A
"the PR got delayed by six days."

Unless carnage, spectacle and sensationalism are involved the mass media are almost always a day late and a dollar short.

PM Summer said...

velociped said...

"@PM Summer
'Haven't I seen these somewhere recently?'

Forget recently; I remember seeing one forty years ago."

At least Cap'n Pike NEEDED one.

Michael Graff said...

@velociped: "Legally, it cannot [use all the same roads a bike can use]. No headlamp; no taillights; no provision for annual inspection."

Just like a bike.

"For the same reasons one does not see golf carts being used on the public roads"

See the evworld link above. Maybe we should re-think those reasons.

So as a licensed motor vehicle driver, I can drive a multi-ton vehicle. Or I can drive my bike. But nothing much in-between?

Why can't I drive a "neighborhood electric vehicle" at 25 MPH on a street with a 40 MPH posted speed limit, when I *CAN* drive my bike at 10 MPH on the same street? Or drive my car at 40+?

How long before some clever legislator notices the discrepancy and decides to apply the NEV rules to bikes?

PM Summer said...

FYI: The "Segway" Law in Texas

Laws for Texas and the Segway PT

SUBCHAPTER C.


ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES

Sec. 551.201. DEFINITION. In this subchapter, "electric personal assistive mobility device" means a two non-tandem wheeled device designed for transporting one person that is:

(1) self-balancing; and

(2) propelled by an electric propulsion system with an average power of 750 watts or one horsepower.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1318, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


Sec. 551.202. OPERATION ON ROADWAY.

(a) A person may operate an electric personal assistive mobility device on a residential street, roadway, or public highway with a speed limit of 30 miles per hour or less only:

(1) while making a direct crossing of a highway in a marked or unmarked crosswalk;

(2) where no sidewalk is available; or

(3) when so directed by a traffic control device or by a law enforcement officer.

(b) A person may operate an electric personal assistive mobility device on a path set aside for the exclusive operation of bicycles.

(c) Any person operating an electric personal assistive mobility device on a residential street, roadway, or public highway shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand edge.

(d) Except as otherwise provided by this section, provisions of this title applicable to the operation of bicycles apply to the operation of electric personal assistive mobility devices.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1318, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


Sec. 551.203. SIDEWALKS. A person may operate an electric personal assistive mobility device on a sidewalk.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1318, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

PM Summer said...

Blogger Michael Graff said...

Why can't I drive a "neighborhood electric vehicle" at 25 MPH on a street with a 40 MPH posted speed limit, when I *CAN* drive my bike at 10 MPH on the same street? Or drive my car at 40+?

How long before some clever legislator notices the discrepancy and decides to apply the NEV rules to bikes?


Very good question, and it picks up on the idea hinted at by this post. Kamen bought off a prominent pedestrian advcay group in NYC, and made big inroads with Transportation Alternatives there, to get their backing for the "anywhere I want to go" laws for the Segway. Manhattan's new side-path system is obviously being eyed as an alternate roadway for the PUMA. It's amazing how much Law you can get for several "small" donations to Political Re-election Committees.

RatherBeBiking said...

Yeah, they did block the 18th street bike lane for their little press event. Lame.